Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Terminality implies non-signalling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1405.3681 v3 pith:GJFGUIH3 submitted 2014-05-14 quant-ph cs.LOmath.CT

classification quant-phcs.LOmath.CT
keywords non-signallingprocessterminalitytheorycausalexplicitstructuretheories
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A 'process theory' is any theory of systems and processes which admits sequential and parallel composition. `Terminality' unifies normalisation of pure states, trace-preservation of CP-maps, and adding up to identity of positive operators in quantum theory, and generalises this to arbitrary process theories. We show that terminality and non-signalling coincide in any process theory, provided one makes causal structure explicit. In fact, making causal structure explicit is necessary to even make sense of non-signalling in process theories. We conclude that because of its much simpler mathematical form, terminality should be taken to be a more fundamental notion than non-signalling.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Taming Entanglement

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    EPR and Bell correlations are presented as selection artifacts: preparing the initial quantum state preselects a subensemble of a larger uncorrelated ensemble of possible histories, and the low-entropy past supplies t...

Pith tools