Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Are 140 Characters Enough? A Large-Scale Linkability Study of Tweets

Information Retrieval · Submitted 11 Jun 2014

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our results, based on a very large corpus of tweets, clearly demonstrate that, at least for relatively active tweeters, linkability of tweets by the same author is easily attained even when the number of tweeters is large.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1406.2746 (version 2)
Pith IDKIBJYM4A, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEkin Oguz, Gene Tsudik, Mishari Almishari, Mohamed Ali Kaafar. "Are 140 Characters Enough? A Large-Scale Linkability Study of Tweets." arXiv:1406.2746 (2014). https://pith.science/paper/KIBJYM4A
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,626 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.62 · human participants 0.66 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.44 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Microblogging is a very popular Internet activity that informs and entertains great multitudes of people world-wide via quickly and scalably disseminated terse messages containing all kinds of newsworthy utterances. Even though microblogging is neither designed nor meant to emphasize privacy, numerous contributors hide behind pseudonyms and compartmentalize their different incarnations via multiple accounts within the same, or across multiple, site(s). Prior work has shown that stylometric analysis is a very powerful tool capable of linking product or service reviews and blogs that are produced by the same author when the number of authors is large. In this paper, we explore linkability of tweets. Our results, based on a very large corpus of tweets, clearly demonstrate that, at least for relatively active tweeters, linkability of tweets by the same author is easily attained even when the number of tweeters is large. We also show that our linkability results hold for a set of actual Twitter users who tweet from multiple accounts. This has some obvious privacy implications, both positive and negative.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Microblogging is a very popular Internet activity that informs and entertains great multitudes of people world-wide via quickly and scalably disseminated terse messages containing all kinds of newsworthy utterances. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 Even though microblogging is neither designed nor meant to emphasize privacy, numerous contributors hide behind pseudonyms and compartmentalize their different incarnations via multiple accounts within the same, or across multiple, site(s). background 0.99 0.07 0.02 asserted 0.99
s2 Prior work has shown that stylometric analysis is a very powerful tool capable of linking product or service reviews and blogs that are produced by the same author when the number of authors is large. background 1.00 0.02 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 In this paper, we explore linkability of tweets. contribution 1.00 0.43 0.02 unclear 0.74
s4 Our results, based on a very large corpus of tweets, clearly demonstrate that, at least for relatively active tweeters, linkability of tweets by the same author is easily attained even when the number of tweeters is large. result 1.00 0.97 0.91 asserted 1.00
s5 We also show that our linkability results hold for a set of actual Twitter users who tweet from multiple accounts. result 0.99 0.96 0.10 asserted 1.00
s6 This has some obvious privacy implications, both positive and negative. interpretation 1.00 0.19 0.03 asserted 0.68

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.83.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Microblogging is a very popular Internet activity that informs and entertains great multitudes of people world-wide via quickly and scalably disseminated terse messages containing all kinds of newsworthy utterances. Even though microblogging is neither designed nor meant to emphasize privacy, numerous contributors hide behind pseudonyms and compartmentalize their different incarnations via multiple accounts within the same, or across multiple, site(s). Prior work has shown that stylometric analysis is a very powerful tool capable of linking product or service reviews and blogs that are produced by the same author when the number of authors is large. In this paper, we explore linkability of tweets. Our results, based on a very large corpus of tweets, clearly demonstrate that, at least for relatively active tweeters, linkability of tweets by the same author is easily attained even when the number of tweeters is large. We also show that our linkability results hold for a set of actual Twitter users who tweet from multiple accounts. This has some obvious privacy implications, both positive and negative.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.