RECORD
An inverse mapping theorem for blow-Nash maps on singular spaces
Algebraic Geometry · Submitted 25 Jun 2014
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We prove that if a blow-Nash self-homeomorphism $f:X\rightarrow X$ satisfies a lower bound of the Jacobian determinant condition then $f^{-1}$ is also blow-Nash and satisfies the same condition.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
A semialgebraic map $f:X\to Y$ between two real algebraic sets is called blow-Nash if it can be made Nash (i.e. semialgebraic and real analytic) by composing with finitely many blowings-up with non-singular centers. We prove that if a blow-Nash self-homeomorphism $f:X\rightarrow X$ satisfies a lower bound of the Jacobian determinant condition then $f^{-1}$ is also blow-Nash and satisfies the same condition. The proof relies on motivic integration arguments and on the virtual Poincar\'e polynomial of McCrory-Parusi\'nski and Fichou. In particular, we need to generalize Denef-Loeser change of variables key lemma to maps that are generically one-to-one and not merely birational.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | A semialgebraic map $f:X\to Y$ between two real algebraic sets is called blow-Nash if it can be made Nash (i.e. semialgebraic and real analytic) by composing with finitely many blowings-up with non-singular centers. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | We prove that if a blow-Nash self-homeomorphism $f:X\rightarrow X$ satisfies a lower bound of the Jacobian determinant condition then $f^{-1}$ is also blow-Nash and satisfies the same condition. | result 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.94 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | The proof relies on motivic integration arguments and on the virtual Poincar\'e polynomial of McCrory-Parusi\'nski and Fichou. | method 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | In particular, we need to generalize Denef-Loeser change of variables key lemma to maps that are generically one-to-one and not merely birational. | method 0.50 | 0.84 | 0.03 | asserted 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
A semialgebraic map $f:X\to Y$ between two real algebraic sets is called blow-Nash if it can be made Nash (i.e. semialgebraic and real analytic) by composing with finitely many blowings-up with non-singular centers. We prove that if a blow-Nash self-homeomorphism $f:X\rightarrow X$ satisfies a lower bound of the Jacobian determinant condition then $f^{-1}$ is also blow-Nash and satisfies the same condition. The proof relies on motivic integration arguments and on the virtual Poincar\'e polynomial of McCrory-Parusi\'nski and Fichou. In particular, we need to generalize Denef-Loeser change of variables key lemma to maps that are generically one-to-one and not merely birational.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 4 sentences
Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label
Cites it as support 1 paper
-
Moreover, by [ref] , $φ̃$ induces a bijection between arcs on $M$ and arcs on $ℝ^d$ not entirely included in some nowhere dense subset of $ℝ^d$.
On a motivic invariant of the arc-analytic equivalence · Arc-analytic equivalence · 0.98
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
We refer the reader to [ref] for the properties of $ℒ_n(M)$ and $ℒ(M)$.
On a motivic invariant of the arc-analytic equivalence · Definition · 0.95
What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
-
The argument of the following lemma is essentially the same as [ref] .
Inverse Function Theorems for Arc-analytic Homeomorphisms · Essence of the proof · 0.87
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.