Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Oscillations in a sunspot with light bridges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1407.1544 v1 pith:ZXU3XBAV submitted 2014-07-06 astro-ph.SR

Oscillations in a sunspot with light bridges

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords oscillationsumbralbridgeoscillationwidefoundlightphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Solar Optical Telescope onboard Hinode observed a sunspot (AR 11836) with two light bridges (LBs) on 31 Aug 2013. We analysed a 2-hour \ion{Ca}{2} H emission intensity data set and detected strong 5-min oscillation power on both LBs and in the inner penumbra. The time-distance plot reveals that 5-min oscillation phase does not vary significantly along the thin bridge, indicating that the oscillations are likely to originate from the underneath. The slit taken along the central axis of the wide light bridge exhibits a standing wave feature. However, at the centre of the wide bridge, the 5-min oscillation power is found to be stronger than at its sides. Moreover, the time-distance plot across the wide bridge exhibits a herringbone pattern that indicates a counter-stream of two running waves originated at the bridge sides. Thus, the 5-min oscillations on the wide bridge also resemble the properties of running penumbral waves. The 5-min oscillations are suppressed in the umbra, while the 3-min oscillations occupy all three cores of the sunspot's umbra, separated by the LBs. The 3-min oscillations were found to be in phase at both sides of the LBs. It may indicate that either LBs do not affect umbral oscillations, or umbral oscillations at different umbral cores share the same source. Also, it indicates that LBs are rather shallow objects situated in the upper part of the umbra. We found that umbral flashes follow the life cycles of umbral oscillations with much larger amplitudes. They cannot propagate across LBs. Umbral flashes dominate the 3-min oscillation power within each core, however, they do not disrupt the phase of umbral oscillation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.