REVIEW 1 cited by
An Overview of STAR Experimental Results
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
With large acceptance and excellent particle identification, STAR is one of the best mid-rapidity collider experiments for studying high-energy nuclear collisions. The STAR experiment provides full information on initial conditions, properties of the hot and dense medium as well as the properties at freeze-out. In Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV, STAR's focus is on the nature of the sQGP produced at RHIC. In order to explore the properties of the QCD phase diagram, since 2010, the experiment has collected sizable data sets of Au+Au collisions at the lower collision energy region where the net-baryon density is large. At the 2014 Quark Matter Conference, the STAR experiment made 16 presentations that cover physics topics including {\it collective dynamics}, {\it electromagnetic probes}, {\it heavy flavor}, {\it initial state physics}, {\it jets}, {\it QCD phase diagram}, {\it thermodynamics and hadron chemistry}, and {\it future experimental facilities, upgrades, and instrumentation} [1-16]. In this overview we will highlight a few results from the STAR experiment, especially those from the recent measurements of the RHIC beam energy scan program. At the end, instead of a summary, we will discuss STAR's near future physics programs at RHIC.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Assessing the Reconstruction of the Critical Line in the QCD Phase Diagram from Imaginary to Real Chemical Potential
In the Quark-Meson model, analytic continuation from imaginary to real chemical potential reproduces the chiral phase boundary only up to mu_conv about 146 MeV and has about 150 percent error near the critical endpoint.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.