Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bayesian inference for a covariance matrix

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1408.4050 v2 pith:IRUYLJSI submitted 2014-08-18 stat.ME

Bayesian inference for a covariance matrix

classification stat.ME
keywords priorcovariancematrixbayesiancorrelationsdistributioninversemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Covariance matrix estimation arises in multivariate problems including multivariate normal sampling models and regression models where random effects are jointly modeled, e.g. random-intercept, random-slope models. A Bayesian analysis of these problems requires a prior on the covariance matrix. Here we assess, through a simulation study and a real data set, the impact this prior choice has on posterior inference of the covariance matrix. Inverse Wishart distribution is the natural choice for a covariance matrix prior because its conjugacy on normal model and simplicity, is usually available in Bayesian statistical software. However inverse Wishart distribution presents some undesirable properties from a modeling point of view. It can be too restrictive because assume the same amount of prior information about every variance parameters and, more important, it shows a prior relationship between the variances and correlations. Some alternatives distributions has been proposed. The scaled inverse Wishart distribution, which give more flexibility on the variance priors conserving the conjugacy property but does not eliminate the prior relationship between variances and correlations. Secondly, it is possible to fit separate priors for individual correlations and standard deviations. This strategy eliminates any prior relationship within the covariance matrix parameters, but it is not conjugate and therefore computationally slow.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Restricted Multivariate Spatial Modeling

    stat.ME 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Develops a restricted MCAR model via reparameterization to measure and control informativeness in multivariate spatial modeling of health events across subgroups.

  2. Model selection with proper scoring rules on data sets of time series: prefer the mean scaled score

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Mean scaled score is recommended over rank-based aggregation for model selection on time series datasets because skewness causes non-mean criteria to select misspecified models with short tests.