RECORD
On the relative motive of a commutative group scheme
Algebraic Geometry · Submitted 11 Sep 2014
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We prove a canonical Kuenneth decomposition of the relative motive with rational coefficients of a smooth commutative group scheme over a noetherian finite dimensional base.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We prove a canonical Kuenneth decomposition of the relative motive with rational coefficients of a smooth commutative group scheme over a noetherian finite dimensional base. This paper is a follow-up of "On the motive of a commutative algebraic group" arXiv:1312.4171
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We prove a canonical Kuenneth decomposition of the relative motive with rational coefficients of a smooth commutative group scheme over a noetherian finite dimensional base. | result 0.79 | 0.96 | 0.95 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | This paper is a follow-up of "On the motive of a commutative algebraic group" arXiv:1312.4171 | background 1.00 | 0.14 | 0.02 | asserted 0.97 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We prove a canonical Kuenneth decomposition of the relative motive with rational coefficients of a smooth commutative group scheme over a noetherian finite dimensional base. This paper is a follow-up of "On the motive of a commutative algebraic group" arXiv:1312.4171
Human review
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 29 sentences
Papers citing it · 19 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
What is more, and highly important for applications, we can construct a class in motivic cohomology for our polylogarithm building on the techniques and results developed in [ref] and [ref] .
Polylogarithm for families of commutative group schemes · Introduction · 0.82
Cites it as support 2 papers
-
The motivic case is established in [ref] (it follows directly from the description of $M_1(G)$ as the motive induced by $G_$).
Polylogarithm for families of commutative group schemes · Second proof · 0.98
-
The motive $Σ^∞A_$ is a direct factor of the homological motive of $A$ by Theorem [ref] , so it is geometrically smooth.
Triangulated categories of relative 1-motives · Motives of Deligne $1$-motives · 0.96
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
In this section, we introduce the relevant definitions and reformulate results from [ref] and [ref] in this language.
Triangulated categories of relative 1-motives · Motives of commutative group schemes · 0.92
-
This is the same notation as in [ref] , our main reference in the sequel.
Polylogarithm for families of commutative group schemes · Motivic setting · 0.92
What it cites · 17 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
-
For this paper, we use indifferently the projective model structures (adapted from presheaves to sheaves) of [ref] or the descent model structures of [ref] .
Triangulated categories of mixed motives · Generalities on relative motives · 0.98
Cites as support 1 paper
-
Assertion ([ref]) is contained in [ref] and [ref] .
Triangulated categories of mixed motives · Triangulated categories with and without transfers · 0.99
Cites as background 1 paper
-
There is a sequence of functors (see [ref] for more details on the last one, the infinite $T$-suspension functor) [equation]
Triangulated categories of mixed motives · Generalities on relative motives · 0.81
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.