RECORD
Catalytic Buffering for Optimal Scheduling of Self-Replication
Molecular Networks · Submitted 18 Sep 2014
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We show that by maintaining a sufficiently large inventory of intermediate metabolites and catalysts required for self-replication, optimal replication times can be achieved by a family of random scheduling algorithms that are biochemically feasible, for which catalysts never idle if they can perform de-novo bio-synthesis.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We study the scheduling problem of a self-replicating factory. We show that by maintaining a sufficiently large inventory of intermediate metabolites and catalysts required for self-replication, optimal replication times can be achieved by a family of random scheduling algorithms that are biochemically feasible, for which catalysts never idle if they can perform de-novo bio-synthesis. Optimally scheduled self-replication is facilitated by allowing several production lines to run in parallel. The excess inventory of catalysts and substrates decouples these lines, while dynamical balancing tunes average and variance completion, resulting in an overall universal distribution for the replication times belonging to the generalized extreme value family. We discuss biological implications and postulate that bacteria that are tuned by evolution for fast replication employ this natural scheduling strategy to achieve optimal asymptotic growth rates by stoichiometrically balancing the amount of work in progress thus globally controlling the number of parallel basic self-replicating units within them. Analysis of recently measured data of E. coli growth in rich media shows data-collapse on a single universal curve consistent with our prediction, suggesting wild type E. coli optimally schedule its replication.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We study the scheduling problem of a self-replicating factory. | background 0.55 | 0.83 | 0.03 | asserted 0.75 |
| s1 | We show that by maintaining a sufficiently large inventory of intermediate metabolites and catalysts required for self-replication, optimal replication times can be achieved by a family of random scheduling algorithms that are biochemically feasible, for which catalysts never idle if they can perform de-novo bio-synthesis. | result 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.76 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Optimally scheduled self-replication is facilitated by allowing several production lines to run in parallel. | result 0.96 | 0.73 | 0.12 | asserted 0.95 |
| s3 | The excess inventory of catalysts and substrates decouples these lines, while dynamical balancing tunes average and variance completion, resulting in an overall universal distribution for the replication times belonging to the generalized extreme value family. | result 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.19 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | We discuss biological implications and postulate that bacteria that are tuned by evolution for fast replication employ this natural scheduling strategy to achieve optimal asymptotic growth rates by stoichiometrically balancing the amount of work in progress thus globally controlling the number of parallel basic self-replicating units within them. | interpretation 1.00 | 0.19 | 0.19 | speculative 0.90 |
| s5 | Analysis of recently measured data of E. coli growth in rich media shows data-collapse on a single universal curve consistent with our prediction, suggesting wild type E. coli optimally schedule its replication. | result 0.89 | 0.66 | 0.25 | hedged possibility 0.97 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We study the scheduling problem of a self-replicating factory. We show that by maintaining a sufficiently large inventory of intermediate metabolites and catalysts required for self-replication, optimal replication times can be achieved by a family of random scheduling algorithms that are biochemically feasible, for which catalysts never idle if they can perform de-novo bio-synthesis. Optimally scheduled self-replication is facilitated by allowing several production lines to run in parallel. The excess inventory of catalysts and substrates decouples these lines, while dynamical balancing tunes average and variance completion, resulting in an overall universal distribution for the replication times belonging to the generalized extreme value family. We discuss biological implications and postulate that bacteria that are tuned by evolution for fast replication employ this natural scheduling strategy to achieve optimal asymptotic growth rates by stoichiometrically balancing the amount of work in progress thus globally controlling the number of parallel basic self-replicating units within them. Analysis of recently measured data of E. coli growth in rich media shows data-collapse on a single universal curve consistent with our prediction, suggesting wild type E. coli optimally schedule its replication.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Papers citing it
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
While the questions and modeling challenges in this context have been long appreciated [ref] , there is renewed interest [ref] due to the recent availability of large datasets for single cell growth trajectories and cell divisions, made possible by major breakthroughs in single cell technologies for unicellular organisms [ref] .
First Passage processes in cellular biology · Biological context. · 0.86
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.