Pith. Sign in

RECORD

An Efficient Heuristic for Betweenness-Ordering

Social and Information Networks · Submitted 23 Sep 2014

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We compare our method with the available techniques in the literature and show that our method produces more efficient ordering than the currently known methods.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1409.6470 (version 3)
Pith IDQTKYHO3C, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationManas Agarwal, Rishi Ranjan Singh, Shubham Chaudhary. "An Efficient Heuristic for Betweenness-Ordering." arXiv:1409.6470 (2014). https://pith.science/paper/QTKYHO3C
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,943 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.26 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.32 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.39 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Centrality measures, erstwhile popular amongst the sociologists and psychologists, have seen broad and increasing applications across several disciplines of late. Amongst a plethora of application specific definitions available in the literature to rank the vertices, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality (page-rank) have been the most important and widely applied ones. Networks where information, signal or commodities are flowing on the edges, surrounds us. Betweenness centrality comes as a handy tool to analyze such systems, but betweenness computation is a daunting task in large size networks. In this paper, we propose an efficient heuristic to determine the betweenness-ordering of $k$ vertices (where $k$ is very less than the total number of vertices) without computing their exact betweenness indices. The algorithm is based on a non-uniform node sampling model which is developed based on the analysis of Erdos-Renyi graphs. We apply our approach to find the betweenness-ordering of vertices in several synthetic and real-world graphs. The proposed heuristic results very efficient ordering even when runs for a linear time in the terms of the number of edges. We compare our method with the available techniques in the literature and show that our method produces more efficient ordering than the currently known methods.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Centrality measures, erstwhile popular amongst the sociologists and psychologists, have seen broad and increasing applications across several disciplines of late. background 1.00 0.03 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 Amongst a plethora of application specific definitions available in the literature to rank the vertices, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality (page-rank) have been the most important and widely applied ones. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Networks where information, signal or commodities are flowing on the edges, surrounds us. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 0.99
s3 Betweenness centrality comes as a handy tool to analyze such systems, but betweenness computation is a daunting task in large size networks. background 0.75 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 In this paper, we propose an efficient heuristic to determine the betweenness-ordering of $k$ vertices (where $k$ is very less than the total number of vertices) without computing their exact betweenness indices. contribution 0.99 0.93 0.40 asserted 1.00
s5 The algorithm is based on a non-uniform node sampling model which is developed based on the analysis of Erdos-Renyi graphs. method 0.99 0.89 0.04 asserted 1.00
s6 We apply our approach to find the betweenness-ordering of vertices in several synthetic and real-world graphs. method 0.73 0.96 0.05 asserted 0.97
s7 The proposed heuristic results very efficient ordering even when runs for a linear time in the terms of the number of edges. result 1.00 0.93 0.38 asserted 1.00
s8 We compare our method with the available techniques in the literature and show that our method produces more efficient ordering than the currently known methods. result 0.98 0.94 0.57 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Centrality measures, erstwhile popular amongst the sociologists and psychologists, have seen broad and increasing applications across several disciplines of late. Amongst a plethora of application specific definitions available in the literature to rank the vertices, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality (page-rank) have been the most important and widely applied ones. Networks where information, signal or commodities are flowing on the edges, surrounds us. Betweenness centrality comes as a handy tool to analyze such systems, but betweenness computation is a daunting task in large size networks. In this paper, we propose an efficient heuristic to determine the betweenness-ordering of $k$ vertices (where $k$ is very less than the total number of vertices) without computing their exact betweenness indices. The algorithm is based on a non-uniform node sampling model which is developed based on the analysis of Erdos-Renyi graphs. We apply our approach to find the betweenness-ordering of vertices in several synthetic and real-world graphs. The proposed heuristic results very efficient ordering even when runs for a linear time in the terms of the number of edges. We compare our method with the available techniques in the literature and show that our method produces more efficient ordering than the currently known methods.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • There are two categories on the state-of-art sampling approximation algorithms: uniform sampling (e.g., to sample nodes with identical probability) [ref] and non-uniform sampling (e.g., each node has a different probability to be sampled) [ref] .

    Refining Approximating Betweenness Centrality Based on Samplings · Related Works · 0.91

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites as background 1 paper
  • Several exact algorithms for large graphs (Sariyüce et al. [ref] ) and dynamic graphs (Lee et al. [ref] , Green et al. [ref] , Kas et al. [ref] , Goel et al. [ref] , Nasre et al. [ref] ) have been developed.

    Betweenness Centrality -- Incremental and Faster · Related work · 0.88

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.