REVIEW 1 cited by
The Lovelace 2.0 Test of Artificial Creativity and Intelligence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Observing that the creation of certain types of artistic artifacts necessitate intelligence, we present the Lovelace 2.0 Test of creativity as an alternative to the Turing Test as a means of determining whether an agent is intelligent. The Lovelace 2.0 Test builds off prior tests of creativity and additionally provides a means of directly comparing the relative intelligence of different agents.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Next Token Prediction Is a Dead End for Creativity
Next-token prediction is argued to be fundamentally misaligned with the spontaneity, adversarial responsiveness, and rhythmic timing of live improvisational creativity such as battle rap.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.