REVIEW 2 cited by
Hardware Counted Profile-Guided Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Hardware Counted Profile-Guided Optimization
read the original abstract
Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) is an excellent means to improve the performance of a compiled program. Indeed, the execution path data it provides helps the compiler to generate better code and better cacheline packing. At the time of this writing, compilers only support instrumentation-based PGO. This proved effective for optimizing programs. However, few projects use it, due to its complicated dual-compilation model and its high overhead. Our solution of sampling Hardware Performance Counters overcome these drawbacks. In this paper, we propose a PGO solution for GCC by sampling Last Branch Record (LBR) events and using debug symbols to recreate source locations of binary instructions. By using LBR-Sampling, the generated profiles are very accurate. This solution achieved an average of 83% of the gains obtained with instrumentation-based PGO and 93% on C++ benchmarks only. The profiling overhead is only 1.06% on average whereas instrumentation incurs a 16% overhead on average.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
AI-PROPELLER: Warehouse-Scale Interprocedural Code Layout Optimization with AlphaEvolve
AI-PROPELLER uses AlphaEvolve to evolve interprocedural code layout heuristics in Propeller and reports 0.23-1.6% gains on warehouse-scale applications via real hardware measurements.
-
AutoPass: Evidence-Guided LLM Agents for Compiler Performance Tuning
AutoPass uses evidence from compiler states and runtime feedback to guide LLM agents in tuning LLVM optimizations, delivering 1.043x and 1.117x geometric-mean speedups over -O3 on x86-64 and ARM64.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.