Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards a resolution of the proton form factor problem: new electron and positron scattering data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1411.6908 v1 pith:YD36JMER submitted 2014-11-25 nucl-ex

D. Adikaram , D. Rimal , L.B. Weinstein , B. Raue , P. Khetarpal , R.P. Bennett , J. Arrington , W.K. Brooks
show 128 more authors
This is my paper
classification nucl-ex
keywords crossdiscrepancyfactorformscatteringcalculationselectronelectron-proton
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

There is a significant discrepancy between the values of the proton electric form factor, $G_E^p$, extracted using unpolarized and polarized electron scattering. Calculations predict that small two-photon exchange (TPE) contributions can significantly affect the extraction of $G_E^p$ from the unpolarized electron-proton cross sections. We determined the TPE contribution by measuring the ratio of positron-proton to electron-proton elastic scattering cross sections using a simultaneous, tertiary electron-positron beam incident on a liquid hydrogen target and detecting the scattered particles in the Jefferson Lab CLAS detector. This novel technique allowed us to cover a wide range in virtual photon polarization ($\varepsilon$) and momentum transfer ($Q^2$) simultaneously, as well as to cancel luminosity-related systematic errors. The cross section ratio increases with decreasing $\varepsilon$ at $Q^2 = 1.45 \text{ GeV}^2$. This measurement is consistent with the size of the form factor discrepancy at $Q^2\approx 1.75$ GeV$^2$ and with hadronic calculations including nucleon and $\Delta$ intermediate states, which have been shown to resolve the discrepancy up to $2-3$ GeV$^2$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools