RECORD
Concentrated terms and varying domains in elliptic equations: Lipschitz case
Analysis of PDEs · Submitted 18 Dec 2014
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We prove that this family of solutions converges to the solutions of a limit problem in H^1 , an elliptic equation with nonlinear boundary conditions which captures the oscillatory behavior of the boundary and whose nonlinear terms are transformed into a flux condition on the boundary.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In this paper, we analyze the behavior of a family of solutions of a nonlinear elliptic equation with nonlinear boundary conditions, when the boundary of the domain presents a highly oscillatory behavior which is uniformly Lipschitz and nonlinear terms are concentrated in a region which neighbors the boundary domain. We prove that this family of solutions converges to the solutions of a limit problem in H^1 , an elliptic equation with nonlinear boundary conditions which captures the oscillatory behavior of the boundary and whose nonlinear terms are transformed into a flux condition on the boundary. Indeed, we show the upper semicontinuity of this family of solutions.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In this paper, we analyze the behavior of a family of solutions of a nonlinear elliptic equation with nonlinear boundary conditions, when the boundary of the domain presents a highly oscillatory behavior which is uniformly Lipschitz and nonlinear terms are concentrated in a region which neighbors the boundary domain. | contribution 0.86 | 0.52 | 0.05 | asserted 0.91 |
| s1 | We prove that this family of solutions converges to the solutions of a limit problem in H^1 , an elliptic equation with nonlinear boundary conditions which captures the oscillatory behavior of the boundary and whose nonlinear terms are transformed into a flux condition on the boundary. | result 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.87 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Indeed, we show the upper semicontinuity of this family of solutions. | result 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In this paper, we analyze the behavior of a family of solutions of a nonlinear elliptic equation with nonlinear boundary conditions, when the boundary of the domain presents a highly oscillatory behavior which is uniformly Lipschitz and nonlinear terms are concentrated in a region which neighbors the boundary domain. We prove that this family of solutions converges to the solutions of a limit problem in H^1 , an elliptic equation with nonlinear boundary conditions which captures the oscillatory behavior of the boundary and whose nonlinear terms are transformed into a flux condition on the boundary. Indeed, we show the upper semicontinuity of this family of solutions.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label
Cites as background 1 paper
-
The dynamics of the flow generated by a nonlinear parabolic problem posed on a $C^2$ domain $Ω$ in $^2$, when some reaction and potential terms are concentrated in a neighborhood of the boundary and the “inner boundary” of this neighborhood presents a highly oscillatory behavior, was studied in [ref] where the continuity of the family of attractors was proved.
Continuity of attractors for a nonlinear parabolic problem with terms concentrating in the boundary · Introduction · 0.87
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.