Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine learning for transient discovery in Pan-STARRS1 difference imaging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1501.05470 v3 pith:JI24L2K2 submitted 2015-01-22 astro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords datalearningmachineratetransientsaroundbestbogus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Efficient identification and follow-up of astronomical transients is hindered by the need for humans to manually select promising candidates from data streams that contain many false positives. These artefacts arise in the difference images that are produced by most major ground-based time domain surveys with large format CCD cameras. This dependence on humans to reject bogus detections is unsustainable for next generation all-sky surveys and significant effort is now being invested to solve the problem computationally. In this paper we explore a simple machine learning approach to real-bogus classification by constructing a training set from the image data of ~32000 real astrophysical transients and bogus detections from the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey. We derive our feature representation from the pixel intensity values of a 20x20 pixel stamp around the centre of the candidates. This differs from previous work in that it works directly on the pixels rather than catalogued domain knowledge for feature design or selection. Three machine learning algorithms are trained (artificial neural networks, support vector machines and random forests) and their performances are tested on a held-out subset of 25% of the training data. We find the best results from the random forest classifier and demonstrate that by accepting a false positive rate of 1%, the classifier initially suggests a missed detection rate of around 10%. However we also find that a combination of bright star variability, nuclear transients and uncertainty in human labelling means that our best estimate of the missed detection rate is approximately 6%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AGNFormer I: Reconstruction of AGN spectra using a probabilistic transformer model

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An uncertainty-aware transformer reconstructs masked AGN broad lines and spectral halves with 4-16% flux errors and beats eleven purpose-built Lyα-reconstruction algorithms on a blind benchmark.

Pith tools