REVIEW 1 cited by
The Fundamental Incompatibility of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Data Subsampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Leveraging the coherent exploration of Hamiltonian flow, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo produces computationally efficient Monte Carlo estimators, even with respect to complex and high-dimensional target distributions. When confronted with data-intensive applications, however, the algorithm may be too expensive to implement, leaving us to consider the utility of approximations such as data subsampling. In this paper I demonstrate how data subsampling fundamentally compromises the efficient exploration of Hamiltonian flow and hence the scalable performance of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo itself.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Calibration of Quantum Devices via Robust Statistical Methods
Advanced Bayesian samplers, especially sequential Monte Carlo with MCMC moves and tempered likelihood estimation, outperform Qiskit's default calibration fits on IBMQ hardware, cutting data needs by up to about 99% in...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.