REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning to Search Better Than Your Teacher
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Methods for learning to search for structured prediction typically imitate a reference policy, with existing theoretical guarantees demonstrating low regret compared to that reference. This is unsatisfactory in many applications where the reference policy is suboptimal and the goal of learning is to improve upon it. Can learning to search work even when the reference is poor? We provide a new learning to search algorithm, LOLS, which does well relative to the reference policy, but additionally guarantees low regret compared to deviations from the learned policy: a local-optimality guarantee. Consequently, LOLS can improve upon the reference policy, unlike previous algorithms. This enables us to develop structured contextual bandits, a partial information structured prediction setting with many potential applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
An Empirical Comparison on Imitation Learning and Reinforcement Learning for Paraphrase Generation
DAgger-style imitation learning outperforms REINFORCE reinforcement learning for paraphrase generation with a pointer-generator, and the best model reaches state-of-the-art scores on Quora.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.