REVIEW 3 cited by
LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Several variants of the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture for recurrent neural networks have been proposed since its inception in 1995. In recent years, these networks have become the state-of-the-art models for a variety of machine learning problems. This has led to a renewed interest in understanding the role and utility of various computational components of typical LSTM variants. In this paper, we present the first large-scale analysis of eight LSTM variants on three representative tasks: speech recognition, handwriting recognition, and polyphonic music modeling. The hyperparameters of all LSTM variants for each task were optimized separately using random search, and their importance was assessed using the powerful fANOVA framework. In total, we summarize the results of 5400 experimental runs ($\approx 15$ years of CPU time), which makes our study the largest of its kind on LSTM networks. Our results show that none of the variants can improve upon the standard LSTM architecture significantly, and demonstrate the forget gate and the output activation function to be its most critical components. We further observe that the studied hyperparameters are virtually independent and derive guidelines for their efficient adjustment.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Language Models as Knowledge Bases?
BERT stores relational knowledge extractable via cloze queries without fine-tuning and matches supervised baselines on open-domain QA tasks.
-
Quantity doesn't buy quality syntax with neural language models
More training data and larger LSTM hidden layers yield diminishing returns on subject-verb agreement accuracy, and GPT and BERT sometimes score below LSTMs trained on far less data.
-
Multimodal Techniques for Malware Classification
Stacking header and section models gives a small accuracy gain over single models, but the gain lacks statistical validation and the dataset is small and imbalanced.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.