Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Standard Model evaluation of $\varepsilon_K$ using lattice QCD inputs for $\hat{B}_K$ and $V_{cb}$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1503.05388 v5 pith:BR54OP7Y submitted 2015-03-18 hep-lat hep-ph

classification hep-lathep-ph
keywords varepsilonmodelstandardlatticevaluedistanceevaluationexclusive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We report the Standard Model evaluation of the indirect CP violation parameter $\varepsilon_K$ using inputs determined from lattice QCD: the kaon bag parameter $\hat{B}_K$, $\xi_0$, $|V_{us}|$ from the $K_{\ell 3}$ and $K_{\mu 2}$ decays, and $|V_{cb}|$ from the axial current form factor for the exclusive decay $\bar{B} \to D^* \ell \bar{\nu}$ at zero-recoil. The theoretical expression for $\varepsilon_K$ is thoroughly reviewed to give an estimate of the size of the neglected corrections, including long distance effects. The Wolfenstein parametrization $(|V_{cb}|, \lambda, \bar{\rho}, \bar{\eta})$ is adopted for CKM matrix elements which enter through the short distance contribution of the box diagrams. For the central value, we take the Unitarity Triangle apex $(\bar{\rho}, \bar{\eta})$ from the angle-only fit of the UTfit collaboration and use $V_{us}$ as an independent input to fix $\lambda$. We find that the Standard Model prediction of $\varepsilon_K$ with exclusive $V_{cb}$ (lattice QCD results) is lower than the experimental value by $3.4\sigma$. However, with inclusive $V_{cb}$ (results of the heavy quark expansion), there is no gap between the Standard Model prediction of $\varepsilon_K$ and its experimental value. For the calculation of $\varepsilon_K$, we perform the renormalization group running to obtain $\eta_{cc}$ at next-to-next-to-leading-order; we find $\eta_{cc}^\mathrm{NNLO}=1.72(27)$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 2024 Update on $\varepsilon_K$ with lattice QCD inputs

    hep-lat 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using 2024 inputs and exclusive |V_cb|, the standard model predicts only about 65% of the measured |epsilon_K|, a gap that vanishes when inclusive |V_cb| is used.

Pith tools