REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey on Methods and Systems for Graph Compression
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We present an informal survey (meant to accompany another paper) on graph compression methods. We focus on lossless methods, briefly list available pproaches, and compare them where possible or give some indicators on their compression ratios. We also mention some relevant results from the field of lossy compression and algorithms specialized for the use on large graphs. --- Note: The comparison is by no means complete. This document is a first draft and will be updated and extended.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CGS: Configurable Graph Summarization with Bounded Neighborhood Loss and Query Support
CGS greedily merges nodes with common neighborhoods into three configurable summary variants that bound neighborhood loss and support exact or high-accuracy graph queries without full decompression.
-
Accelerating Loading WebGraphs in ParaGrapher
PG-Fuse and CompBin speed up loading of WebGraph-format graphs by up to 7.6x and 21.8x, respectively, on a high-bandwidth shared filesystem.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.