REVIEW 2 cited by
Exploring multi-dimensional spaces: a Comparison of Latin Hypercube and Quasi Monte Carlo Sampling Techniques
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Three sampling methods are compared for efficiency on a number of test problems of various complexity for which analytic quadratures are available. The methods compared are Monte Carlo with pseudo-random numbers, Latin Hypercube Sampling, and Quasi Monte Carlo with sampling based on Sobol sequences. Generally results show superior performance of the Quasi Monte Carlo approach based on Sobol sequences in line with theoretical predictions. Latin Hypercube Sampling can be more efficient than both Monte Carlo method and Quasi Monte Carlo method but the latter inequality holds for a reduced set of function typology and at small number of sampled points. In conclusion Quasi Monte Carlo method would appear the safest bet when integrating functions of unknown typology.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Improving Discrepancy Measures for Global Sensitivity Analysis
Rank-transforming the output and imputing isolated empty grid cells turns the ersatz discrepancy into a theoretically grounded, zero-extra-cost screener that matches Sobol' rankings better and uniquely succeeds on non...
-
Nested Simulation Methods for Sobol' Index Estimation: Bias Correction, Budget Allocation, and Latin Hypercube Sampling
Nested-simulation view of Sobol' index estimation yields MSE rates, optimal outer/inner budgets, and jackknife/LHS guidance for pick-freeze-style estimators.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.