Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Multidimensional Summation-By-Parts Operators: General Theory and Application to Simplex Elements

Numerical Analysis · Submitted 12 May 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In particular, a diagonal-norm SBP operator exists on a given domain if and only if there is a cubature rule with positive weights on that domain and the polynomial-basis matrix has full rank when evaluated at the cubature nodes.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1505.03125 (version 3)
Pith IDKAQJDDAP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDavid C. Del Rey Fern\'andez, David W. Zingg, Jason E. Hicken. "Multidimensional Summation-By-Parts Operators: General Theory and Application to Simplex Elements." arXiv:1505.03125 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/KAQJDDAP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,028 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.24 · states limitation 0.39 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Summation-by-parts (SBP) finite-difference discretizations share many attractive properties with Galerkin finite-element methods (FEMs), including time stability and superconvergent functionals; however, unlike FEMs, SBP operators are not completely determined by a basis, so the potential exists to tailor SBP operators to meet different objectives. To date, application of high-order SBP discretizations to multiple dimensions has been limited to tensor product domains. This paper presents a definition for multi-dimensional SBP finite-difference operators that is a natural extension of one-dimensional SBP operators. Theoretical implications of the definition are investigated for the special case of a diagonal norm (mass) matrix. In particular, a diagonal-norm SBP operator exists on a given domain if and only if there is a cubature rule with positive weights on that domain and the polynomial-basis matrix has full rank when evaluated at the cubature nodes. Appropriate simultaneous-approximation terms are developed to impose boundary conditions weakly, and the resulting discretizations are shown to be time stable. Concrete examples of multi-dimensional SBP operators are constructed for the triangle and tetrahedron; similarities and differences with spectral-element and spectral-difference methods are discussed. An assembly process is described that builds diagonal-norm SBP operators on a global domain from element-level operators. Numerical results of linear advection on a doubly periodic domain demonstrate the accuracy and time stability of the simplex operators.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Summation-by-parts (SBP) finite-difference discretizations share many attractive properties with Galerkin finite-element methods (FEMs), including time stability and superconvergent functionals; however, unlike FEMs, SBP operators are not completely determined by a basis, so the potential exists to tailor SBP operators to meet different objectives. background 0.98 0.08 0.06 asserted 0.80
s1 To date, application of high-order SBP discretizations to multiple dimensions has been limited to tensor product domains. gap 0.88 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 This paper presents a definition for multi-dimensional SBP finite-difference operators that is a natural extension of one-dimensional SBP operators. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.19 asserted 1.00
s3 Theoretical implications of the definition are investigated for the special case of a diagonal norm (mass) matrix. contribution 0.62 0.85 0.07 asserted 0.78
s4 In particular, a diagonal-norm SBP operator exists on a given domain if and only if there is a cubature rule with positive weights on that domain and the polynomial-basis matrix has full rank when evaluated at the cubature nodes. result 0.95 0.82 0.34 asserted 1.00
s5 Appropriate simultaneous-approximation terms are developed to impose boundary conditions weakly, and the resulting discretizations are shown to be time stable. method 0.47 0.93 0.12 asserted 1.00
s6 Concrete examples of multi-dimensional SBP operators are constructed for the triangle and tetrahedron; similarities and differences with spectral-element and spectral-difference methods are discussed. contribution 0.93 0.93 0.12 asserted 0.99
s7 An assembly process is described that builds diagonal-norm SBP operators on a global domain from element-level operators. method 0.80 0.90 0.07 asserted 0.98
s8 Numerical results of linear advection on a doubly periodic domain demonstrate the accuracy and time stability of the simplex operators. result 0.98 0.95 0.18 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.95 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Summation-by-parts (SBP) finite-difference discretizations share many attractive properties with Galerkin finite-element methods (FEMs), including time stability and superconvergent functionals; however, unlike FEMs, SBP operators are not completely determined by a basis, so the potential exists to tailor SBP operators to meet different objectives. To date, application of high-order SBP discretizations to multiple dimensions has been limited to tensor product domains. This paper presents a definition for multi-dimensional SBP finite-difference operators that is a natural extension of one-dimensional SBP operators. Theoretical implications of the definition are investigated for the special case of a diagonal norm (mass) matrix. In particular, a diagonal-norm SBP operator exists on a given domain if and only if there is a cubature rule with positive weights on that domain and the polynomial-basis matrix has full rank when evaluated at the cubature nodes. Appropriate simultaneous-approximation terms are developed to impose boundary conditions weakly, and the resulting discretizations are shown to be time stable. Concrete examples of multi-dimensional SBP operators are constructed for the triangle and tetrahedron; similarities and differences with spectral-element and spectral-difference methods are discussed. An assembly process is described that builds diagonal-norm SBP operators on a global domain from element-level operators. Numerical results of linear advection on a doubly periodic domain demonstrate the accuracy and time stability of the simplex operators.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.