Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An Efficient Inexact ABCD Method for Least Squares Semidefinite Programming

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1505.04278 v2 pith:EG3I6HUR submitted 2015-05-16 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords methodabcdblockacceleratedcoordinatefunctioninexactinvolving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider least squares semidefinite programming (LSSDP) where the primal matrix variable must satisfy given linear equality and inequality constraints, and must also lie in the intersection of the cone of symmetric positive semidefinite matrices and a simple polyhedral set. We propose an inexact accelerated block coordinate descent (ABCD) method for solving LSSDP via its dual, which can be reformulated as a convex composite minimization problem whose objective is the sum of a coupled quadratic function involving four blocks of variables and two separable non-smooth functions involving only the first and second block, respectively. Our inexact ABCD method has the attractive $O(1/k^2)$ iteration complexity if the subproblems are solved progressively more accurately. The design of our ABCD method relies on recent advances in the symmetric Gauss-Seidel technique for solving a convex minimization problem whose objective is the sum of a multi-block quadratic function and a non-smooth function involving only the first block. Extensive numerical experiments on various classes of over 600 large scale LSSDP problems demonstrate that our proposed ABCD method not only can solve the problems to high accuracy, but it is also far more efficient than (a) the well known BCD (block coordinate descent) method, (b) the eARBCG (an enhanced version of the accelerated randomized block coordinate gradient) method, and (c) the APG (accelerated proximal gradient) method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools