REVIEW 1 cited by
Centrally Banked Cryptocurrencies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Current cryptocurrencies, starting with Bitcoin, build a decentralized blockchain-based transaction ledger, maintained through proofs-of-work that also generate a monetary supply. Such decentralization has benefits, such as independence from national political control, but also significant limitations in terms of scalability and computational cost. We introduce RSCoin, a cryptocurrency framework in which central banks maintain complete control over the monetary supply, but rely on a distributed set of authorities, or mintettes, to prevent double-spending. While monetary policy is centralized, RSCoin still provides strong transparency and auditability guarantees. We demonstrate, both theoretically and experimentally, the benefits of a modest degree of centralization, such as the elimination of wasteful hashing and a scalable system for avoiding double-spending attacks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Partially Synchronous BFT Consensus Made Practical in Wireless Networks
ReduceCatch reduces the number of active senders with repeated TDMA broadcasts and then uses CSMA with NACK to recover lost packets, improving latency and throughput of PBFT, Tendermint, and HotStuff in wireless ad ho...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.