Recognition: unknown
Coherent nonhelical shear dynamos driven by magnetic fluctuations at low Reynolds numbers
read the original abstract
Nonhelical shear dynamos are studied with a particular focus on the possibility of coherent dynamo action. The primary results -- serving as a follow up to the results of Squire & Bhattacharjee [arXiv:1506.04109 (2015)] -- pertain to the "magnetic shear-current effect" as a viable mechanism to drive large-scale magnetic field generation. This effect raises the interesting possibility that the saturated state of the small-scale dynamo could drive large-scale dynamo action, and is likely to be important in the unstratified regions of accretion disk turbulence. In this paper, the effect is studied at low Reynolds numbers, removing the complications of small-scale dynamo excitation and aiding analysis by enabling the use of quasi-linear statistical simulation methods. In addition to the magnetically driven dynamo, new results on the kinematic nonhelical shear dynamo are presented. These illustrate the relationship between coherent and incoherent driving in such dynamos, demonstrating the importance of rotation in determining the relative dominance of each mechanism.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Wave interference as the origin of the cyclic magnetorotational dynamo in accretion disks: insights from weakly nonlinear theory and local shearing box simulations
Wave interference from beats between nearly degenerate MRI eigenfrequencies generates the cyclic large-scale magnetic field reversals in unstratified accretion disks, with a predicted dominant period of roughly 30 orb...
-
Wave interference as the origin of the cyclic magnetorotational dynamo in accretion disks: insights from weakly nonlinear theory and local shearing box simulations
Wave interference from beats between nearly degenerate MRI eigenfrequencies drives cyclic large-scale dynamos in unstratified accretion disks via an oscillating shear-current effect, predicting a period of ~30(1+a²)^{...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.