Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Canonical Correlation Forests

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1507.05444 v6 pith:67V2YEP7 submitted 2015-07-20 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords canonicalccfscorrelationdecisionforeststrainingtreeaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce canonical correlation forests (CCFs), a new decision tree ensemble method for classification and regression. Individual canonical correlation trees are binary decision trees with hyperplane splits based on local canonical correlation coefficients calculated during training. Unlike axis-aligned alternatives, the decision surfaces of CCFs are not restricted to the coordinate system of the inputs features and therefore more naturally represent data with correlated inputs. CCFs naturally accommodate multiple outputs, provide a similar computational complexity to random forests, and inherit their impressive robustness to the choice of input parameters. As part of the CCF training algorithm, we also introduce projection bootstrapping, a novel alternative to bagging for oblique decision tree ensembles which maintains use of the full dataset in selecting split points, often leading to improvements in predictive accuracy. Our experiments show that, even without parameter tuning, CCFs out-perform axis-aligned random forests and other state-of-the-art tree ensemble methods on both classification and regression problems, delivering both improved predictive accuracy and faster training times. We further show that they outperform all of the 179 classifiers considered in a recent extensive survey.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SBAMDT: Bayesian Additive Decision Trees with Adaptive Soft Semi-multivariate Split Rules

    stat.ML 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SBAMDT is a Bayesian additive tree model with hard-or-soft and univariate-or-multivariate splits, reporting better spatial predictions than existing tree ensembles.

  2. Oblique Bayesian additive regression trees

    stat.ML 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Bayesian additive regression tree model that grows trees with random oblique hyperplane splits, using a spike-and-slab prior on split directions, matches or beats axis-aligned BART on several benchmarks.

Pith tools