RECORD
$\Phi$-Carleson measures and multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces of the unit ball of $\mathbb {C}^n$
Classical Analysis and ODEs · Submitted 27 Aug 2015
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We then characterize $\Phi$-Carleson measures for Bergman-Orlicz spaces, and apply them to characterize multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We define the notion of $\Phi$-Carleson measures where $\Phi$ is either a concave growth function or a convex growth function and provide an equivalent definition. We then characterize $\Phi$-Carleson measures for Bergman-Orlicz spaces, and apply them to characterize multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We define the notion of $\Phi$-Carleson measures where $\Phi$ is either a concave growth function or a convex growth function and provide an equivalent definition. | contribution 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.11 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | We then characterize $\Phi$-Carleson measures for Bergman-Orlicz spaces, and apply them to characterize multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces. | contribution 0.74 | 0.95 | 0.72 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We define the notion of $\Phi$-Carleson measures where $\Phi$ is either a concave growth function or a convex growth function and provide an equivalent definition. We then characterize $\Phi$-Carleson measures for Bergman-Orlicz spaces, and apply them to characterize multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.