Pith. Sign in

RECORD

$\Phi$-Carleson measures and multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces of the unit ball of $\mathbb {C}^n$

Classical Analysis and ODEs · Submitted 27 Aug 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We then characterize $\Phi$-Carleson measures for Bergman-Orlicz spaces, and apply them to characterize multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1508.06869 (version 1)
Pith ID77R4MTY3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBeno\^it F. Sehba. "$\Phi$-Carleson measures and multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces of the unit ball of $\mathbb {C}^n$." arXiv:1508.06869 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/77R4MTY3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,313 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We define the notion of $\Phi$-Carleson measures where $\Phi$ is either a concave growth function or a convex growth function and provide an equivalent definition. We then characterize $\Phi$-Carleson measures for Bergman-Orlicz spaces, and apply them to characterize multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We define the notion of $\Phi$-Carleson measures where $\Phi$ is either a concave growth function or a convex growth function and provide an equivalent definition. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.11 asserted 1.00
s1 We then characterize $\Phi$-Carleson measures for Bergman-Orlicz spaces, and apply them to characterize multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces. contribution 0.74 0.95 0.72 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We define the notion of $\Phi$-Carleson measures where $\Phi$ is either a concave growth function or a convex growth function and provide an equivalent definition. We then characterize $\Phi$-Carleson measures for Bergman-Orlicz spaces, and apply them to characterize multipliers between Bergman-Orlicz spaces.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.