Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Take and Took, Gaggle and Goose, Book and Read: Evaluating the Utility of Vector Differences for Lexical Relation Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1509.01692 v4 pith:BPR3DZQT submitted 2015-09-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords learninglexicalrelationsvectorwordembeddingsrelationdifferences
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work on word embeddings has shown that simple vector subtraction over pre-trained embeddings is surprisingly effective at capturing different lexical relations, despite lacking explicit supervision. Prior work has evaluated this intriguing result using a word analogy prediction formulation and hand-selected relations, but the generality of the finding over a broader range of lexical relation types and different learning settings has not been evaluated. In this paper, we carry out such an evaluation in two learning settings: (1) spectral clustering to induce word relations, and (2) supervised learning to classify vector differences into relation types. We find that word embeddings capture a surprising amount of information, and that, under suitable supervised training, vector subtraction generalises well to a broad range of relations, including over unseen lexical items.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decoding Consumer Preferences Using Attention-Based Language Models

    econ.EM 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-stage language-model method estimates private valuations and bidder counts from car auction descriptions and outperforms OLS and one-stage baselines out of sample.

Pith tools