Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The study of multi-frequency scattering of ten radio pulsars

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 18 Sep 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Combining the new data with the results published earlier by Lewandowski et al., we revisited the scaling index versus the dispersion measure (DM) relation, and similarly to some of the earlier studies we show that the average value of the scaling index deviates from the theoretical predictions for large DM pulsars, however it reaches the magnitude claimed by L\"ohmer et al. only for pulsars with very large DMs ($>$650 pc cm$^{-3}$).

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1509.05593 (version 1)
Pith IDZFMNQIPA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBhaswati Bhattacharyya, Jaroslaw Kijak, Jayanta Roy, Karolina Rozko, Wojciech Lewandowski. "The study of multi-frequency scattering of ten radio pulsars." arXiv:1509.05593 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/ZFMNQIPA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,894 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.94 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.91 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present the results of the multi-frequency scatter time measurements for ten radio pulsars that were relatively less studied in this regard. The observations were performed using the Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope at the observing frequencies of 150, 235, 325, 610 and 1060~MHz. The data we collected, in conjunction with the results from other frequencies published earlier, allowed us to estimate the scatter time frequency scaling indices for eight of these sources. For PSR J1852$-$0635 it occurred that its profile undergoes a strong evolution with frequency, which makes the scatter time measurements difficult to perform, and for PSR J1835$-$1020 we were able to obtain reliable pulse broadening estimates at only two frequencies. We used the eight frequency scaling indices to estimate both: the electron density fluctuation strengths along the respective lines-of-sight, and the standardized amount of scattering at the frequency of 1 GHz. Combining the new data with the results published earlier by Lewandowski et al., we revisited the scaling index versus the dispersion measure (DM) relation, and similarly to some of the earlier studies we show that the average value of the scaling index deviates from the theoretical predictions for large DM pulsars, however it reaches the magnitude claimed by L\"ohmer et al. only for pulsars with very large DMs ($>$650 pc cm$^{-3}$). We also investigated the dependence of the scattering strength indicators on the pulsar distance, DM, and the position of the source in the Milky Way Galaxy.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present the results of the multi-frequency scatter time measurements for ten radio pulsars that were relatively less studied in this regard. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.05 asserted 0.99
s1 The observations were performed using the Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope at the observing frequencies of 150, 235, 325, 610 and 1060~MHz. method 1.00 0.92 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 The data we collected, in conjunction with the results from other frequencies published earlier, allowed us to estimate the scatter time frequency scaling indices for eight of these sources. result 0.45 0.90 0.07 asserted 0.99
s3 For PSR J1852$-$0635 it occurred that its profile undergoes a strong evolution with frequency, which makes the scatter time measurements difficult to perform, and for PSR J1835$-$1020 we were able to obtain reliable pulse broadening estimates at only two frequencies. limitation 0.98 0.94 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 We used the eight frequency scaling indices to estimate both: the electron density fluctuation strengths along the respective lines-of-sight, and the standardized amount of scattering at the frequency of 1 GHz. method 0.60 0.96 0.11 asserted 1.00
s5 Combining the new data with the results published earlier by Lewandowski et al., we revisited the scaling index versus the dispersion measure (DM) relation, and similarly to some of the earlier studies we show that the average value of the scaling index deviates from the theoretical predictions for large DM pulsars, however it reaches the magnitude claimed by L\"ohmer et al. only for pulsars with very large DMs ($>$650 pc cm$^{-3}$). result 0.87 0.89 0.49 asserted 1.00
s6 We also investigated the dependence of the scattering strength indicators on the pulsar distance, DM, and the position of the source in the Milky Way Galaxy. contribution 0.96 0.94 0.07 asserted 0.67

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present the results of the multi-frequency scatter time measurements for ten radio pulsars that were relatively less studied in this regard. The observations were performed using the Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope at the observing frequencies of 150, 235, 325, 610 and 1060~MHz. The data we collected, in conjunction with the results from other frequencies published earlier, allowed us to estimate the scatter time frequency scaling indices for eight of these sources. For PSR J1852$-$0635 it occurred that its profile undergoes a strong evolution with frequency, which makes the scatter time measurements difficult to perform, and for PSR J1835$-$1020 we were able to obtain reliable pulse broadening estimates at only two frequencies. We used the eight frequency scaling indices to estimate both: the electron density fluctuation strengths along the respective lines-of-sight, and the standardized amount of scattering at the frequency of 1 GHz. Combining the new data with the results published earlier by Lewandowski et al., we revisited the scaling index versus the dispersion measure (DM) relation, and similarly to some of the earlier studies we show that the average value of the scaling index deviates from the theoretical predictions for large DM pulsars, however it reaches the magnitude claimed by L\"ohmer et al. only for pulsars with very large DMs ($>$650 pc cm$^{-3}$). We also investigated the dependence of the scattering strength indicators on the pulsar distance, DM, and the position of the source in the Milky Way Galaxy.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Uses its data or values 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.