pith. sign in

arxiv: 1509.06536 · v1 · pith:F5G3L3X5new · submitted 2015-09-22 · 💻 cs.CY

Laypeople and Experts risk perception of Cloud Computing Services

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords riskcloudcomputingperceptionservicesadoptionassessmentexperts
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Cloud computing is revolutionising the way software services are procured and used by Government organizations and SMEs. Quantitative risk assessment of Cloud services is complex and undermined by specific security concerns regarding data confidentiality, integrity and availability. This study explores how the gap between the quantitative risk assessment and the perception of the risk can produce a bias in the decision-making process about Cloud computing adoption. The risk perception of experts in Cloud computing (N=37) and laypeople (N=81) about ten Cloud computing services was investigated using the psychometric paradigm. Results suggest that the risk perception of Cloud services can be represented by two components, called dread risk and unknown risk, which may explain up to 46% of the variance. Other factors influencing the risk perception were perceived benefits, trust in regulatory authorities and technology attitude. This study suggests some implications that could support Government and non-Government organizations in their strategies for Cloud computing adoption.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Perception Gaps in Risk, Benefit, and Value Between Experts and Public Challenge Socially Accepted AI

    cs.CY 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Experts rate AI scenarios as more likely, less risky, more beneficial, and more valuable than the public, applying different weightings to risk versus benefit.