Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Cooperative Equilibrium beyond Social Dilemmas: Pareto Solvable Games

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1509.07599 v1 pith:RJUUIIR4 submitted 2015-09-25 cs.GT physics.soc-phq-bio.PE

classification cs.GTphysics.soc-phq-bio.PE
keywords gamecooperativeequilibriumgamesbehaviourdilemmasparetosocial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A recently introduced concept of "cooperative equilibrium", based on the assumption that players have a natural attitude to cooperation, has been proven a powerful tool in predicting human behaviour in social dilemmas. In this paper, we extend this idea to more general game models, termed "Pareto solvable" games, which in particular include the Nash Bargaining Problem and the Ultimatum Game. We show that games in this class possess a unique pure cooperative equilibrium. Furthermore, for the Ultimatum Game, this notion appears to be strongly correlated with a suitably defined variant of the Dictator Game. We support this observation with the results of a behavioural experiment conducted using Amazon Mechanical Turk, which demonstrates that our approach allows for making statistically precise predictions of average behaviour in such settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools