Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Theoretical and observational constraints of viable f(R) theories of gravity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1511.00102 v1 pith:2WYGTIKW submitted 2015-10-31 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

classification gr-qcastro-ph.CO
keywords gravitymodeltheoriesviableaccelerationconditionsconstraintscosmological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modified gravity has attracted much attention over the last few years and remains a potential candidate for dark energy. In particular, the so-called viable f(R) gravity theories, which are able to both recover General Relativity (GR) and produce late-time cosmic acceleration, have been widely studied in recent literature. Nevertheless, extended theories of gravity suffer from several shortcomings which compromise their ability to provide realistic alternatives to the standard cosmological Lambda CDM Concordance model. We address the existence of cosmological singularities and the conditions that guarantee late-time acceleration,assuming reasonable energy conditions for standard matter in the so-called Hu-Sawicki f(R) model, currently among the most widely studied modifications to General Relativity. Then using the Supernovae Ia Union 2.1 catalogue, we further constrain the free parameters of this model. The combined analysis of both theoretical and observational constraints sheds some light on the viable parameter space of these models and the form of the underlying effective theory of gravity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modified gravity/Dynamical Dark Energy vs $\Lambda$CDM: is the game over?

    gr-qc 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An AIC/χ² comparison of exponential F(R) gravity, wCDM, and CPL models against Pantheon+, DESI DR1, cosmic chronometer, and Planck-compressed data claims ΛCDM is excluded at 4σ, but the significance conversion is not ...

Pith tools