REVIEW 2 cited by
Security and Privacy Policy Languages: A Survey, Categorization and Gap Identification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
For security and privacy management and enforcement purposes, various policy languages have been presented. We give an overview on 27 security and privacy policy languages and present a categorization framework for policy languages. We show how the current policy languages are represented in the framework and summarize our interpretation. We show up identified gaps and motivate for the adoption of policy languages for the specification of privacy-utility trade-off policies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SoK: Three Facets of Privacy Policies
A systematic review of privacy policies shows that natural language, graphical, and machine-readable forms each serve one community, and no single form can be simultaneously legal, understandable, and enforceable.
-
120 Domain-Specific Languages for Security
Systematic literature review of 120 security DSLs reveals high fragmentation with opportunities for integration and gaps in usability and evaluation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.