Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Flexible sparse regularization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1601.04429 v1 pith:OSWJ4M6A submitted 2016-01-18 math.NA cs.NA

Flexible sparse regularization

classification math.NA cs.NA
keywords correspondingregularizationspacessparseconvexf-normsflexibleintroduce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The seminal paper of Daubechies, Defrise, DeMol made clear that $\ell^p$ spaces with $p\in [1,2)$ and $p$-powers of the corresponding norms are appropriate settings for dealing with reconstruction of sparse solutions of ill-posed problems by regularization. It seems that the case $p=1$ provides the best results in most of the situations compared to the cases $p\in (1,2)$. An extensive literature gives great credit also to using $\ell^p$ spaces with $p\in (0,1)$ together with the corresponding quasinorms, although one has to tackle challenging numerical problems raised by the non-convexity of the quasi-norms. In any of these settings, either super, linear or sublinear, the question of how to choose the exponent $p$ has been not only a numerical issue, but also a philosophical one. In this work we introduce a more flexible way of sparse regularization by varying exponents. We introduce the corresponding functional analytic framework, that leaves the setting of normed spaces but works with so-called F-norms. One curious result is that there are F-norms which generate the $\ell^1$ space, but they are strictly convex, while the $\ell^1$-norm is just convex.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.