REVIEW 2 cited by
Attention Inequality in Social Media
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Attention Inequality in Social Media
read the original abstract
Social media can be viewed as a social system where the currency is attention. People post content and interact with others to attract attention and gain new followers. In this paper, we examine the distribution of attention across a large sample of users of a popular social media site Twitter. Through empirical analysis of these data we conclude that attention is very unequally distributed: the top 20\% of Twitter users own more than 96\% of all followers, 93\% of the retweets, and 93\% of the mentions. We investigate the mechanisms that lead to attention inequality and find that it results from the "rich-get-richer" and "poor-get-poorer" dynamics of attention diffusion. Namely, users who are "rich" in attention, because they are often mentioned and retweeted, are more likely to gain new followers, while those who are "poor" in attention are likely to lose followers. We develop a phenomenological model that quantifies attention diffusion and network dynamics, and solve it to study how attention inequality grows over time in a dynamic environment of social media.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Joint Effects of Recommender Systems and Network Structure on the Visibility of Content and Creators
Agent-based simulations show recommender logic sets visibility regimes, with popularity-based systems creating reinforcement loops that concentrate exposure while collaborative filtering distributes it broadly, and ne...
-
Persistent Structural Inequality of Online Interactions Across Platforms
Inequality in online user engagement, quantified via KL-divergence, inverse coefficient of variation, and log-Gini on bipartite networks, remains stable over time across multiple platforms and interaction types.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.