pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1602.03506 · v1 · submitted 2016-02-10 · 💻 cs.AI · stat.ML

Recognition: unknown

Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence

Stuart Russell (Berkeley) , Daniel Dewey (FHI) , Max Tegmark (MIT)
Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.AI stat.ML
keywords artificialbeneficialbenefitsintelligencepotentialresearchrobustworthwhile
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Success in the quest for artificial intelligence has the potential to bring unprecedented benefits to humanity, and it is therefore worthwhile to investigate how to maximize these benefits while avoiding potential pitfalls. This article gives numerous examples (which should by no means be construed as an exhaustive list) of such worthwhile research aimed at ensuring that AI remains robust and beneficial.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI safety via debate

    stat.ML 2018-05 conditional novelty 8.0

    AI agents trained through competitive debate can allow polynomial-time human judges to oversee PSPACE-level questions, with MNIST experiments boosting sparse classifier accuracy from 59% to 89% using only 6 pixels.