Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

StreamingBandit; Experimenting with Bandit Policies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.06700 v2 pith:LTCFFNDG submitted 2016-02-22 cs.HC cs.CY

classification cs.HCcs.CY
keywords policiesstreamingbanditbanditappliedfieldproblemstudiesaddress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A large number of statistical decision problems in the social sciences and beyond can be framed as a (contextual) multi-armed bandit problem. However, it is notoriously hard to develop and evaluate policies that tackle these types of problem, and to use such policies in applied studies. To address this issue, this paper introduces StreamingBandit, a Python web application for developing and testing bandit policies in field studies. StreamingBandit can sequentially select treatments using (online) policies in real time. Once StreamingBandit is implemented in an applied context, different policies can be tested, altered, nested, and compared. StreamingBandit makes it easy to apply a multitude of bandit policies for sequential allocation in field experiments, and allows for the quick development and re-use of novel policies. In this article, we detail the implementation logic of StreamingBandit and provide several examples of its use.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring Offline Policy Evaluation for the Continuous-Armed Bandit Problem

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A δ-window extension of Li et al.'s offline bandit evaluation lets logged actions near a policy's choice count, giving a biased but rank-preserving (at coarse level) way to compare continuous-armed bandit policies.

Pith tools