Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DSiD: a Delphes Detector for ILC Physics Studies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.07748 v2 pith:CKAG5HL5 submitted 2016-02-24 hep-ph hep-ex

classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords rightarrowdetectordelphesdsidcarddescribedescribeddesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We describe DSiD, a fast simulation Delphes detector for the International Linear Collider (ILC) based on the full simulation performance of the SiD detector. SiD is one of two detectors described in the ILC Technical Design Report (TDR). The tracking efficiency, tracking momentum resolution, electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeter energy resolution, particle identification and flavor tagging efficiencies are taken from the Detailed Baseline Design (DBD) study as described in ILC TDR Volume 4: Detectors. In a cross-check study with $4 \times 10^6$ $e^+ e^- \rightarrow b \bar{b}$ events generated at $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV and simulated by Delphes with the DSiD detector card, these performance characteristics are measured and found to be commensurate with the DBD results. For a new physics use case example, we describe a study of Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric $e^+ e^- \rightarrow 2 \chi_3 \rightarrow 2\chi_1 2 h_1$ with $h_1 \rightarrow 2a_1$ or $h_1 \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ at the $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV ILC. The card is available on HepForge.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating the Impact of Detector Design on Jet Flavor Tagging for Future Colliders

    physics.ins-det 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fast-simulation study shows detectors with time-of-flight and cluster-counting particle ID tag strange jets up to 2.5 times better than SiD, while calorimeter resolution variations barely affect jet flavor tagging.

Pith tools