RECORD
On the Strong Novikov Conjecture of Locally Compact Groups for Low Degree Cohomology Classes
K-Theory and Homology · Submitted 2 Apr 2016
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The main result of this paper is non-vanishing of the image of the index map from the $G$-equivariant $K$-homology of a proper $G$-compact $G$-manifold $X$ to the $K$-theory of the $C^{*}$-algebra of the group $G$.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The main result of this paper is non-vanishing of the image of the index map from the $G$-equivariant $K$-homology of a proper $G$-compact $G$-manifold $X$ to the $K$-theory of the $C^{*}$-algebra of the group $G$. Under the assumption that the Kronecker pairing of a $K$-homology class with a low-dimensional cohomology class is non-zero, we prove that the image of this class under the index map is non-zero. Neither discreteness of the locally compact group $G$ nor freeness of the action of $G$ on $X$ are required. The case of free actions of discrete groups was considered earlier by B. Hanke and T. Schick.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The main result of this paper is non-vanishing of the image of the index map from the $G$-equivariant $K$-homology of a proper $G$-compact $G$-manifold $X$ to the $K$-theory of the $C^{*}$-algebra of the group $G$. | result 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.98 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | Under the assumption that the Kronecker pairing of a $K$-homology class with a low-dimensional cohomology class is non-zero, we prove that the image of this class under the index map is non-zero. | result 0.86 | 0.94 | 0.24 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Neither discreteness of the locally compact group $G$ nor freeness of the action of $G$ on $X$ are required. | contribution 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | The case of free actions of discrete groups was considered earlier by B. Hanke and T. Schick. | background 0.99 | 0.03 | 0.01 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The main result of this paper is non-vanishing of the image of the index map from the $G$-equivariant $K$-homology of a proper $G$-compact $G$-manifold $X$ to the $K$-theory of the $C^{*}$-algebra of the group $G$. Under the assumption that the Kronecker pairing of a $K$-homology class with a low-dimensional cohomology class is non-zero, we prove that the image of this class under the index map is non-zero. Neither discreteness of the locally compact group $G$ nor freeness of the action of $G$ on $X$ are required. The case of free actions of discrete groups was considered earlier by B. Hanke and T. Schick.
Human review
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences
Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 1 paper
-
Although the $G$-manifold should be connected in [ref] , however in this case, we can apply it to $Z$ after replacing some arguments in [ref] as follows.
$G$-Homotopy Invariance of the Analytic Signature of Proper Co-compact $G$-manifolds and Equivariant Novikov Conjecture · On proof of Corollary [ref] · 0.96
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
[ref] When constructing a $U(1)$-valued cocycle $α∈Z(G;U(1))$ from the given line bundle, we just use a line bundle $L$ over $X$ ignoring $f_^*$ over $Y$.
$G$-Homotopy Invariance of the Analytic Signature of Proper Co-compact $G$-manifolds and Equivariant Novikov Conjecture · On proof of Corollary [ref] · 0.84
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.