Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Asymptotic Theory of Rerandomization in Treatment-Control Experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1604.00698 v4 pith:YRYCXVOJ submitted 2016-04-03 math.ST stat.APstat.TH

classification math.STstat.APstat.TH
keywords rerandomizationcovariateasymptoticcausaltheoryaveragebalancecomplete
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Although complete randomization ensures covariate balance on average, the chance for observing significant differences between treatment and control covariate distributions increases with many covariates. Rerandomization discards randomizations that do not satisfy a predetermined covariate balance criterion, generally resulting in better covariate balance and more precise estimates of causal effects. Previous theory has derived finite sample theory for rerandomization under the assumptions of equal treatment group sizes, Gaussian covariate and outcome distributions, or additive causal effects, but not for the general sampling distribution of the difference-in-means estimator for the average causal effect. To supplement existing results, we develop asymptotic theory for rerandomization without these assumptions, which reveals a non-Gaussian asymptotic distribution for this estimator, specifically a linear combination of a Gaussian random variable and a truncated Gaussian random variable. This distribution follows because rerandomization affects only the projection of potential outcomes onto the covariate space but does not affect the corresponding orthogonal residuals. We also demonstrate that, compared to complete randomization, rerandomization reduces the asymptotic sampling variances and quantile ranges of the difference-in-means estimator. Moreover, our work allows the construction of accurate large-sample confidence intervals for the average causal effect, thereby revealing further advantages of rerandomization over complete randomization.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimal Designs with Robust Inference for Binary Treatment Effects

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Balanced designs that balance covariates (especially blocking) are asymptotically variance-optimal for binary ATE under Neyman's nonparametric model, and a CMH-based variance estimator is finite-sample conservative an...

Pith tools