Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Intrinsic rotation drive by collisionless trapped electron mode turbulence

Plasma Physics · Submitted 8 Apr 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This may induce intrinsic counter-current rotation or flattening of the co-current rotation profile.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1604.02205 (version 1)
Pith IDINJJPS6A, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLu Wang, P. H. Diamond, Shuitao Peng. "Intrinsic rotation drive by collisionless trapped electron mode turbulence." arXiv:1604.02205 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/INJJPS6A
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,236 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.38 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.17 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.14 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Both the parallel residual stress and parallel turbulent acceleration driven by electrostatic collisionsless trapped electron mode (CTEM) turbulence are calculated analytically using gyrokinetic theory. Quasilinear results show that the parallel residual stress contributes an outward flux of co-current rotation for normal magnetic shear and turbulence intensity profile increasing outward. This may induce intrinsic counter-current rotation or flattening of the co-current rotation profile. The parallel turbulent acceleration driven by CTEM turbulence vanishes, due to the absence of a phase shift between density fluctuation and ion pressure fluctuation. This is different from the case of ion temperature gradient (ITG) turbulence, for which the turbulent acceleration can provide co-current drive for normal magnetic shear and turbulence intensity profile increasing outward. Its order of magnitude is predicted to be the same as that of the divergence of the residual stress [Lu Wang and P.H. Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 110}, 265006 (2013)]. A possible connection of these theoretical results to experimental observations of electron cyclotron heating effects on toroidal rotation is discussed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Both the parallel residual stress and parallel turbulent acceleration driven by electrostatic collisionsless trapped electron mode (CTEM) turbulence are calculated analytically using gyrokinetic theory. method 0.52 0.92 0.10 asserted 1.00
s1 Quasilinear results show that the parallel residual stress contributes an outward flux of co-current rotation for normal magnetic shear and turbulence intensity profile increasing outward. result 1.00 0.87 0.27 asserted 1.00
s2 This may induce intrinsic counter-current rotation or flattening of the co-current rotation profile. interpretation 0.98 0.67 0.19 hedged possibility 1.00
s3 The parallel turbulent acceleration driven by CTEM turbulence vanishes, due to the absence of a phase shift between density fluctuation and ion pressure fluctuation. result 1.00 0.86 0.22 asserted 1.00
s4 This is different from the case of ion temperature gradient (ITG) turbulence, for which the turbulent acceleration can provide co-current drive for normal magnetic shear and turbulence intensity profile increasing outward. result 0.63 0.51 0.17 asserted 1.00
s5 Its order of magnitude is predicted to be the same as that of the divergence of the residual stress [Lu Wang and P.H. result 0.93 0.62 0.08 asserted 0.68
s6 Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 110}, 265006 (2013)]. background 0.70 0.05 0.02 unclear 0.85
s7 A possible connection of these theoretical results to experimental observations of electron cyclotron heating effects on toroidal rotation is discussed. interpretation 0.96 0.43 0.04 hedged possibility 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Both the parallel residual stress and parallel turbulent acceleration driven by electrostatic collisionsless trapped electron mode (CTEM) turbulence are calculated analytically using gyrokinetic theory. Quasilinear results show that the parallel residual stress contributes an outward flux of co-current rotation for normal magnetic shear and turbulence intensity profile increasing outward. This may induce intrinsic counter-current rotation or flattening of the co-current rotation profile. The parallel turbulent acceleration driven by CTEM turbulence vanishes, due to the absence of a phase shift between density fluctuation and ion pressure fluctuation. This is different from the case of ion temperature gradient (ITG) turbulence, for which the turbulent acceleration can provide co-current drive for normal magnetic shear and turbulence intensity profile increasing outward. Its order of magnitude is predicted to be the same as that of the divergence of the residual stress [Lu Wang and P.H. Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 110}, 265006 (2013)]. A possible connection of these theoretical results to experimental observations of electron cyclotron heating effects on toroidal rotation is discussed.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.