Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Typical Stability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1604.03336 v2 pith:OAHOLMLW submitted 2016-04-12 cs.LG cs.DS

classification cs.LGcs.DS
keywords stabilitytypicaldatasetquerieswhencomputeddistributionnotion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we introduce a notion of algorithmic stability called typical stability. When our goal is to release real-valued queries (statistics) computed over a dataset, this notion does not require the queries to be of bounded sensitivity -- a condition that is generally assumed under differential privacy [DMNS06, Dwork06] when used as a notion of algorithmic stability [DFHPRR15a, DFHPRR15b, BNSSSU16] -- nor does it require the samples in the dataset to be independent -- a condition that is usually assumed when generalization-error guarantees are sought. Instead, typical stability requires the output of the query, when computed on a dataset drawn from the underlying distribution, to be concentrated around its expected value with respect to that distribution. We discuss the implications of typical stability on the generalization error (i.e., the difference between the value of the query computed on the dataset and the expected value of the query with respect to the true data distribution). We show that typical stability can control generalization error in adaptive data analysis even when the samples in the dataset are not necessarily independent and when queries to be computed are not necessarily of bounded-sensitivity as long as the results of the queries over the dataset (i.e., the computed statistics) follow a distribution with a "light" tail. Examples of such queries include, but not limited to, subgaussian and subexponential queries. We also discuss the composition guarantees of typical stability and prove composition theorems that characterize the degradation of the parameters of typical stability under $k$-fold adaptive composition. We also give simple noise-addition algorithms that achieve this notion. These algorithms are similar to their differentially private counterparts, however, the added noise is calibrated differently.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Role of Randomness in Stability

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Randomness complexity for replicability and differential privacy equals, up to one bit, the inverse log of global stability, and finite randomness complexity of PAC learning exactly matches finite Littlestone dimension.

  2. Enforcing Demographic Coherence: A Harms Aware Framework for Reasoning about Private Data Release

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Demographic coherence is a new necessary-condition privacy definition, and the paper proves differential privacy implies it and gives parameter conversions.

  3. Paradise of Forking Paths: Revisiting the Adaptive Data Analysis Problem

    stat.ME 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Pólya-tree Bayesian scheme for adaptive counting queries estimates a distribution with lower MSE than non-adaptive histograms in simulated Gaussian mixtures.

Pith tools