Recognition: unknown
Avoiding Wireheading with Value Reinforcement Learning
read the original abstract
How can we design good goals for arbitrarily intelligent agents? Reinforcement learning (RL) is a natural approach. Unfortunately, RL does not work well for generally intelligent agents, as RL agents are incentivised to shortcut the reward sensor for maximum reward -- the so-called wireheading problem. In this paper we suggest an alternative to RL called value reinforcement learning (VRL). In VRL, agents use the reward signal to learn a utility function. The VRL setup allows us to remove the incentive to wirehead by placing a constraint on the agent's actions. The constraint is defined in terms of the agent's belief distributions, and does not require an explicit specification of which actions constitute wireheading.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Concrete Problems in AI Safety
The paper categorizes five concrete AI safety problems arising from flawed objectives, costly evaluation, and learning dynamics.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.