Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Exposing nanobubble-like objects to a degassed environment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1605.07405 v1 pith:KYFDRZZO submitted 2016-05-24 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.soft

classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.soft
keywords nanobubble-likeobjectsnanobubbleswatercontaminationdegasseddisposableexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The primary attribute of interest of surface nanobubbles is their unusual stability and a number of theories trying to explain this have been put forward. Interestingly, the dissolution of nanobubbles is a topic that did not receive a lot of attention yet. In this work we applied two different experimental procedures which should cause gaseous nanobubbles to completely dissolve. In our experiments we nucleated nanobubble-like objects by putting a drop of water on HOPG using a plastic syringe and disposable needle. In method A, the nanobubble-like objects were exposed to a flow of degassed water (1.17 mg/l) for 96 hours. In method B, the ambient pressure was lowered in order to degas the liquid and the nanobubble-like objects. Interestingly, the nanobubble-like objects remained stable after exposure to both methods. After thorough investigation of the procedures and materials used during our experiments, we found that the nanobubble-like object were induced by the use of disposable needles in which PDMS contaminated the water. It is very important for the nanobubble community to be aware of the fact that, although features look and behave like nanobubbles, in some cases they might in fact be or induced by contamination. The presence of contamination could also resolve some inconsistencies found in the nanobubble literature.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools