Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Proper motions of 15 pulsars: a comparison between Bayesian and frequentist algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1605.08574 v1 pith:WSWOOFDV submitted 2016-05-27 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords pulsarsmotionsproperbayesianfrequentistmethodmethodsobtained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present proper motions for 15 pulsars which are observed regularly by the Nanshan 25-m radio telescope. Two methods, the frequentist method (Coles et al.2011) and the Bayesian (Lentati et al. 2014) method, are used and the results are compared. We demonstrate that the two methods can be applied to young pulsar data sets that exhibit large amounts of timing noise with steep spectral exponents and give consistent results. The measured positions also agree with very-long-baseline interferometric positions. Proper motions for four pulsars are obtained for the first time, and improved values are obtained for five pulsars.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools