Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Modified Energy Functionals and the NLS Approximation

Analysis of PDEs · Submitted 31 May 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We give a new proof of the fact that wave packet solutions of this equation are approximated by the nonlinear Schrodinger equation.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1606.00028 (version 1)
Pith IDGPACTPVE, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC. Eugene Wayne, Patrick Cummings. "Modified Energy Functionals and the NLS Approximation." arXiv:1606.00028 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/GPACTPVE
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,602 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider a model equation from [14] that captures important properties of the water wave equation. We give a new proof of the fact that wave packet solutions of this equation are approximated by the nonlinear Schrodinger equation. This proof both simplifies and strengthens the results of [14] so that the approximation holds for the full interval of existence of the approximate NLS solution rather than just a subinterval. Furthermore, the proof avoids the problems associated with inverting the normal form transform in [14] by working with a modified energy functional motivated by [1] and [8].

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider a model equation from [14] that captures important properties of the water wave equation. background 0.96 0.27 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 We give a new proof of the fact that wave packet solutions of this equation are approximated by the nonlinear Schrodinger equation. contribution 0.85 0.95 0.71 asserted 1.00
s2 This proof both simplifies and strengthens the results of [14] so that the approximation holds for the full interval of existence of the approximate NLS solution rather than just a subinterval. result 0.79 0.93 0.65 asserted 1.00
s3 Furthermore, the proof avoids the problems associated with inverting the normal form transform in [14] by working with a modified energy functional motivated by [1] and [8]. method 0.81 0.87 0.09 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider a model equation from [14] that captures important properties of the water wave equation. We give a new proof of the fact that wave packet solutions of this equation are approximated by the nonlinear Schrodinger equation. This proof both simplifies and strengthens the results of [14] so that the approximation holds for the full interval of existence of the approximate NLS solution rather than just a subinterval. Furthermore, the proof avoids the problems associated with inverting the normal form transform in [14] by working with a modified energy functional motivated by [1] and [8].

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.