Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Coordination Annotation Extension in the Penn Tree Bank

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.02529 v1 pith:CXTWYF5K submitted 2016-06-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords coordinationannotationcoordinationserrorsextensioninconsistenciesmissingpenn
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Coordination is an important and common syntactic construction which is not handled well by state of the art parsers. Coordinations in the Penn Treebank are missing internal structure in many cases, do not include explicit marking of the conjuncts and contain various errors and inconsistencies. In this work, we initiated manual annotation process for solving these issues. We identify the different elements in a coordination phrase and label each element with its function. We add phrase boundaries when these are missing, unify inconsistencies, and fix errors. The outcome is an extension of the PTB that includes consistent and detailed structures for coordinations. We make the coordination annotation publicly available, in hope that they will facilitate further research into coordination disambiguation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools