Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Automatic Environmental Sound Recognition: Performance versus Computational Cost

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1607.04589 v1 pith:N4UX74RS submitted 2016-07-15 cs.SD cs.LGcs.NE

classification cs.SDcs.LGcs.NE
keywords computationalcostsoundaccuracyaesrautomaticclassificationcomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the context of the Internet of Things (IoT), sound sensing applications are required to run on embedded platforms where notions of product pricing and form factor impose hard constraints on the available computing power. Whereas Automatic Environmental Sound Recognition (AESR) algorithms are most often developed with limited consideration for computational cost, this article seeks which AESR algorithm can make the most of a limited amount of computing power by comparing the sound classification performance em as a function of its computational cost. Results suggest that Deep Neural Networks yield the best ratio of sound classification accuracy across a range of computational costs, while Gaussian Mixture Models offer a reasonable accuracy at a consistently small cost, and Support Vector Machines stand between both in terms of compromise between accuracy and computational cost.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools