Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Metacognitive Training in Professional Development Can Improve and Sustain Student Achievement

Physics Education · Submitted 26 Jul 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This continued improvement in student scores indicated that the teachers and schools changed in a sustainable way.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.83 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1607.07856 (version 1)
Pith IDQOT3TBRH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJeffrey A. Phillips, Katharine W. Clemmer, M. Catherine McElwain. "Metacognitive Training in Professional Development Can Improve and Sustain Student Achievement." arXiv:1607.07856 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/QOT3TBRH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,642 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.97 · controlled comparison 0.64 · randomized assignment 0.03 · states quantitative result 0.26 · compares with prior results 0.87 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Secondary school students in the United States continue to underachieve in mathematics and science. Improving teacher quality is a core component of improving student achievement. Here we report on a professional development program, the MAST System, that develops the knowledge and skills for teaching mathematics, including metacognitive knowledge and regulation. In this cognitive apprenticeship program, teachers learn to plan, evaluate and adjust to improve student engagement and achievement. Central is the metacognitive practice of defense of instruction. By practicing this reflective approach, teachers become adaptive experts, able to innovate in the classroom. During the two-year intervention, the MAST System resulted in large increases in the California Standards Test mathematics scores, compared to both the district and the state. In addition, improvement continued for several years after the intervention was completed. This continued improvement in student scores indicated that the teachers and schools changed in a sustainable way.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Secondary school students in the United States continue to underachieve in mathematics and science. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Improving teacher quality is a core component of improving student achievement. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Here we report on a professional development program, the MAST System, that develops the knowledge and skills for teaching mathematics, including metacognitive knowledge and regulation. contribution 0.96 0.66 0.05 asserted 0.98
s3 In this cognitive apprenticeship program, teachers learn to plan, evaluate and adjust to improve student engagement and achievement. method 0.93 0.37 0.04 asserted 0.99
s4 Central is the metacognitive practice of defense of instruction. method 0.92 0.28 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 By practicing this reflective approach, teachers become adaptive experts, able to innovate in the classroom. interpretation 0.54 0.28 0.07 asserted 1.00
s6 During the two-year intervention, the MAST System resulted in large increases in the California Standards Test mathematics scores, compared to both the district and the state. result 1.00 0.95 0.34 asserted 1.00
s7 In addition, improvement continued for several years after the intervention was completed. result 1.00 0.90 0.15 asserted 1.00
s8 This continued improvement in student scores indicated that the teachers and schools changed in a sustainable way. interpretation 1.00 0.83 0.49 hedged possibility 0.83

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.99 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Secondary school students in the United States continue to underachieve in mathematics and science. Improving teacher quality is a core component of improving student achievement. Here we report on a professional development program, the MAST System, that develops the knowledge and skills for teaching mathematics, including metacognitive knowledge and regulation. In this cognitive apprenticeship program, teachers learn to plan, evaluate and adjust to improve student engagement and achievement. Central is the metacognitive practice of defense of instruction. By practicing this reflective approach, teachers become adaptive experts, able to innovate in the classroom. During the two-year intervention, the MAST System resulted in large increases in the California Standards Test mathematics scores, compared to both the district and the state. In addition, improvement continued for several years after the intervention was completed. This continued improvement in student scores indicated that the teachers and schools changed in a sustainable way.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.