Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

BPS counting for knots and combinatorics on words

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1608.06600 v1 pith:CQ7XXXIY submitted 2016-08-23 hep-th math.COmath.GTmath.QA

classification hep-thmath.COmath.GTmath.QA
keywords invariantsseriesequationsextremalquantumwordsa-polynomialscombinatorial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We discuss relations between quantum BPS invariants defined in terms of a product decomposition of certain series, and difference equations (quantum A-polynomials) that annihilate such series. We construct combinatorial models whose structure is encoded in the form of such difference equations, and whose generating functions (Hilbert-Poincar\'e series) are solutions to those equations and reproduce generating series that encode BPS invariants. Furthermore, BPS invariants in question are expressed in terms of Lyndon words in an appropriate language, thereby relating counting of BPS states to the branch of mathematics referred to as combinatorics on words. We illustrate these results in the framework of colored extremal knot polynomials: among others we determine dual quantum extremal A-polynomials for various knots, present associated combinatorial models, find corresponding BPS invariants (extremal Labastida-Mari\~no-Ooguri-Vafa invariants) and discuss their integrality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On explicit formulae of LMOV invariants

    hep-th 2019-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper derives explicit formulas for LMOV invariants of the framed unknot, but the multi-hole formula (29) is wrong as written.

  2. Knot-quiver correspondence: a brief review

    hep-th 2025-05 unverdicted

    A survey of the known knot-quiver correspondence, including quiver equivalences, diagonalization, and an extension to knot complements.

Pith tools