Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Dictionary-based Approach to Racism Detection in Dutch Social Media

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1608.08738 v1 pith:CSCJ7EAG submitted 2016-08-31 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords dictionarywerecreateddictionariesdutchracistapproachcomments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a dictionary-based approach to racism detection in Dutch social media comments, which were retrieved from two public Belgian social media sites likely to attract racist reactions. These comments were labeled as racist or non-racist by multiple annotators. For our approach, three discourse dictionaries were created: first, we created a dictionary by retrieving possibly racist and more neutral terms from the training data, and then augmenting these with more general words to remove some bias. A second dictionary was created through automatic expansion using a \texttt{word2vec} model trained on a large corpus of general Dutch text. Finally, a third dictionary was created by manually filtering out incorrect expansions. We trained multiple Support Vector Machines, using the distribution of words over the different categories in the dictionaries as features. The best-performing model used the manually cleaned dictionary and obtained an F-score of 0.46 for the racist class on a test set consisting of unseen Dutch comments, retrieved from the same sites used for the training set. The automated expansion of the dictionary only slightly boosted the model's performance, and this increase in performance was not statistically significant. The fact that the coverage of the expanded dictionaries did increase indicates that the words that were automatically added did occur in the corpus, but were not able to meaningfully impact performance. The dictionaries, code, and the procedure for requesting the corpus are available at: https://github.com/clips/hades

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Don't Erase, Inform! Detecting and Contextualizing Harmful Language in Cultural Heritage Collections

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors present a multilingual vocabulary and a detection tool using string matching, NER and LLM disambiguation that flags and contextualizes harmful language in cultural heritage metadata, reporting 87 percent p...

  2. Leveraging the Potential of Prompt Engineering for Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Relabeling hate speech as metaphor pairs (red/green, summer/winter) in prompts raises Llama2's F1 on a 500-item Bengali subsample to 95.89, though the gain is reported without matched test-set comparisons or error bars.

Pith tools